Cordell, M. (2017). Wolf in the Snow. Macmillan.
This book is rather interesting when considering it for evaluation in that, barring onomatopoeia, there is no text. So this evaluation will instead focus entirely on the art, as it its the means of telling the story. There is a lot of intentionality in regard to direction that is seen in the beginning as our two protagonists come to meet one another.
Heading home after school |
| Wolf pack on the move |
It continues in this way as the two move closer and closer together in a way that builds the tension and anticipation of what will happen when they do meet. Let's also talk about line and definition. In the images above the humans in this story lack definition and detail, making them feel soft and fragile, almost an abstraction of a human. The wolves on the other hand are very realistically drawn, those teeth and the lolling tongue as their hot breath condenses in the air just exudes danger. Their fur is sketch-like, with wild tufts and tray ink lines giving them a sharp appearance when compared to the soft yellow loops of the background. We see this much more starkly later in the story, when the lost wolf pup and child meet the rest of the wolf pack.
| Eyes lock, danger is felt, who will move first? |
Here, at the climax of the story we zero in, the rough circles bringing our focus directly to the eyes of these two characters. The child looks vulnerable, scared, but unwavering. The wolf is a wild animal. It was a strong choice to present the danger of this situation so predominantly, wolves are wild animals after all. A lesser story may have decided to soften this, but it's what makes the protagonist's bravery and compassion compelling, something that is eventually rewarded when the wolves help their family find them huddled up and cold.
There are many aspects of this story that could be considered, as it has a whole lot to say despite having no words. The art is compelling, rich, emotive, and the choices made are self-evidently deliberate. Perhaps, one day, I will write a very long evaluation of that work, but alas, I do not have the space for it today.
Love, J. (2018). Julián is a Mermaid. Candlewick Press.
Another book with very minimal text, and one that hits close to home as a transgender woman. Love's surrealist watercolor illustrations give the entire work a fluid, dream like quality. Lines are incredibly minimal, with color being the primary means of drawing the eye to particular parts of the page.
Huge shocks of brilliant colors lead the reader's eye from page to page, until it is time to get off the train.
These are well written and helpful (to a potential purchaser) evaluative content. Remember in your formal evaluations that you start with a hook sentence and summary, then evaluation and conclusion. A good rule of thumb is 40% summary/60% eval and analysis.
ReplyDeleteYou'll also want to consider length, as the assignments have a low word count. Based on these evaluations, you could cut your word count simply by editing for the filler words and phrases (like "let's also talk about...").
Also remember that for a professional review, you should leave out "I" statements (like the story about your office) and moral statements (even in favor of a title). It especially helps if you are asked to review something different than your beliefs. If you can stick to the quality of the work, it is easier to keep from blasting an author. :)